Part I  – Everton Football Club Company Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022/23

Part I – Everton Football Club Company Limited Annual Report and Accounts

The cynicism and lack of respect for shareholders, fans and all other interested parties in Everton, including commercial partners, it must be said, shows no limits. Issuing critically sought after reports and accounts late on an Easter Sunday afternoon with no prior briefing demonstrates the utter contempt in which Farhad Moshiri holds all concerned.

The provision of accounts for Everton Football Club Company Limited alone, provide an incomplete picture of Everton’s position. The failure to provide accounts for Everton Stadium Development Company Limited at the same time is a complete dereliction of duty. It makes the task of providing a complete picture much more difficult, and is obstructive and unnecessary. One might consider it deliberate.

When one adds that shareholders no longer have the opportunity to question the board of directors at general meetings, the picture becomes complete. For many, the bonds which hold us to our beloved club are being stretched to the absolute limit.

Perhaps the new regulator can seek the necessary powers to force football clubs that have minority investors, to hold shareholder meetings?

Profit and Loss Account

Following an ongoing trend under the Moshiri years, the profit and loss account shows a final loss for the financial year 2022/23 of £89.1 million. The loss for 2021/22 was restated to £38.3 million.

Since 2016, Everton’s losses are

206/17 – £30.7 million profit
2017/18 – £13.1 million loss
2018/19 – £111.8 million loss
2019/20 – £139.8 million loss
2020/21 – £121.0 million loss
2021/22 – £38.3 million loss
2022/23 – £89.1 million loss

The deterioration in the profit and loss account is largely due to the decrease in turnover, the significant deterioration in player and management trading and an increase in operating costs . At the operating level, losses widened from £24.5 million to £40.9 million.

Turnover

Turnover fell from £181 million to £172.2 million largely influenced by the loss of USM related sponsorship revenues.
Broadcast income increased marginally by £0.9 million to £116.0 million as a result of an increase in international rights payments offset by a reduction in domestic TV revenues – caused by a lower league position and reduced live TV appearances.

Everton’s decision to maintain price increases in season tickets – Everton sell the maximum number of season tickets permitted by the Premier League – saw an increase in gate receipts from £15.6 million to £17.3 million. Everton’s yield per seat remains significantly lower than most of its Premier League rivals, highlighting the need to move from Goodison Park, even if the cost of doing so is placing enormous strain on Everton’s finances.

Sponsorship income fell for the third successive year from £35.0 million to £19.2 million. The removal of the various USM related sponsorship arrangements was netted against marginal improvements across the sponsorship portfolio, including Stake.com, BOXT and Socios. The failure to replace any of the USM related sponsorships reflects the poor condition of the club generally, and the ineffectiveness of the club’s commercial strategies .and performance.

Other commercial activities showed a significant improvement of £4.4 million to £19.7 million – driven by increases in the Premier League central sponsorship revenues, increased income from overseas tours to the USA and Australia, plus payments from UEFA relating to player appearances in the 2022 World Cup..

Costs
On the expense side of the profit and loss account, non-exceptional operating costs managed to climb by £5.0 million. Add in exceptional costs of £3.2 million relating to payments to former employees and costs in total rose from ££205.5 million to £213.1 million.
Overall staff costs reduced by £3 million from £162 million to £159 million. Incredibly, given the cost pressures on the club, staff numbers overall increased from 491 to 532. Both marketing and media plus management and administration departments saw increases in staff numbers.

An important measure, particularly in the context of future regulation, is the total wage to turnover ratio. This increased from 90% in 2021/22 to 92% in 2022/23, considerably outside of projected future wage cost limits. Even prior to the change in financial regulations, the wage/turnover ratio remains much higher than the levels (70%) considered sustainable in the Premier League.

Directors’ Costs increased significantly from £3.1 million to £5.7 million. Included within this figure is a £2.5 million compensation cost for loss of office. The highest paid director received £3.246 million compared to the previous year’s £868,000.

Costs relating to the new stadium no longer feature in the profit and loss account as they are now considered a capital cost given the increased certainty of the project being completed. Total construction costs for the year to 30 June 2023 stood at £210.9 million, a small increase on the previous year’s £207 million.

Amortisation, much loved by accounting and non-accounting fans alike, bucked recent trends and increased significantly from £68.3 million to £77.6 million, reflecting player acquisitions in the summer of 2022 and the winter of 2023. McNeil, Onana, Maupay, Gana Gueye and James Garner being the significant additions. Total player acquisition costs were £91.5 million (2021/22 – £55 million).
The total value of players (intangible assets) decreased from £148.9 million to £144.5 million.

Yet again, compensation payments to leaving members of the coaching and management staff (Lampard et al) were significant – £7.1 million. The 2021/22 figure relating to Benitez et al’s departure was £10.5 million.

In addition, this year, there was a return of impairment charges to player valuations of £4.8 million (2021/22 Nil).

Interest costs

Interest costs for the 2021/22 accounts were restated.

Previously stated as £10.4 million in 2021/22 the newly issued accounts show a revised figure of £4.15 million. The reduction of interest costs of £6.25 million arises from the capitalisation of interest costs relating to the new stadium. This has the impact of restating losses for 2021/22.
Following the restatement and capitalisation of interest costs, interest costs on external debt rose from £4.15 million to £7.86 million. I will cover the funding requirements separately.

Player Trading

The sale of Anthony Gordon, Broadhead and Simms saw player trading profits of £47.5 million – a significant reduction in the previous year’s profits of £67.7 million.

Cashflow – the life blood of every business
Any observer of a company’s financial performance and health will always point to the company’s cash flow statement. Whilst the P&L grabs the headlines, the most telling information is in the cash flow statements. A business lives or dies by its ability to generate cash.
Cash can be generated from day to day operating activities, from investing activities (player trading, shareholder equity injections) and from financing activities (borrowings).

Operations

In 2022/23 normal operating activities before movements in working capital saw negative cash flow of £42.3 million – a large increase on the previous 2020/21 figure of £22 million. After the change in balances of creditors and debtors the negative cash flow from operations deteriorated further from the previous year to £56.5 million (2021/22 £34.3 million)

Investing

Cash from investing activities saw a greatly improved inflow of £72.3 million (2021/22 – £25.2 million) from player disposals – this is selling players to raise cash. A reduction in player acquisitions saw a cash outflow of £58.7 million in 2022/23 (£86 million in 2021/22).
. The new stadium and other fixed assets saw cash outflows of £194.35 million, slightly less than the 2021/22 figure of £210.5 million.
As a result investing activities saw a total cash outflow of £199.7 million – a reduction from the £271.4 million in 2021/22.

Financing

Financing contributed a net £234.6 million (2021/22 – £277.75 million).

Included in these figures are repayment of existing borrowings of £22.5 million; new external loans of £191.2 million and shareholder loans (from Moshiri) of £69.7 million.

As a result of the above, cash in the bank fell by a further £21.6million to £10.8 million as at 30 June 2023

Borrowings

Shareholder loans totalled £450.75 million. The loan is to be repaid at a date mutually agreeable to Bluesky Capital and Everton Football Club. The loan is interest free.

Aside from shareholder loans, as at 30 June 2023, Everton have a £150 million 5 year facility with Rights and Media Funding, a further £52.66 million three year facility and an additional 34 month 28 million loan with the same lender. The above loans are secured by a fixed and floating charge on the assets of the club. These loans attract interest at 5% above the current base rate.

In addition there is the remaining CLBILS facility with the club’s bankers Metro Bank which stood at £11.25 million (£26.25 million on June 30 2022).
In total, external debt stood at £ 341.4 million (2021/22 £174.1 million) an increase in borrowings of £167.3 million

Share capital and reserves

At the time of the accounts, £135,000 of ordinary shares, a share premium account of £324.9 million, a negative profit and loss reserve (accumulated losses) of £550.5 million and £447.25 million shareholder loan from Bluesky Capital, a company controlled by Farhad Moshiri.
As a result shareholder funds stood at £227.73 million (2021/22 £241.2 million)

Post balance sheet events

Since 30th June 2023, Everton entered agreements to acquire Beto and Chermiti on permanent transfers, Harrison on loan from Leeds United, Danjuma from Villareal and Ashley Young as a free agent. Iwobi, Gray and Cannon have been sold with temporary loans for Holgate and Maupay. The net impact of these plus other transactions (including contingent transactions) is £9.15 million.

In addition to the £450.25 million interest free loan Bluesky Capital provided a further £22.5 million interest bearing loan.

On the 15th September 2023, Farhad Moshiri announced an agreement with 777 Partners to sell his entire 94.1% holding. This agreement was, and remains subject to regulatory approval. Approval from the Premier League has not yet been granted although the conditions required for such approval are now known – details here.

Summary

The club continues to be caught in a perfect storm of underperformance on and off the pitch, combined with the complete indifference of the current owner. His misjudgements over the years have resulted in successive breaches of the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules, a huge reduction in our ability to remain competitive and enormous concerns over our ability to stay in business.

I will cover in detail in Part II, our funding requirements, including the stadium development company, MSP’s funding and in particular the auditors concerns regarding the future of the business (going concern) in the event of relegation this season. In addition further comments on the stadium, MSP’s position and future funding requirements. I will also cover its relevance to profitability and sustainability regulations

The great Moshiri experiment, of throwing money at managers and players in the most irresponsible manner; of not having systems nor personnel in place to monitor, correctly advise and act, has reached the stage where the risk profile of the business has reached untenable levels.

His misjudgements are colossal. His total reliance on external short term funding, his choice of potential new owner highly damaging and existentially threatening.

It should be stressed that the above report and accounts do not take into account the borrowings from 777 Partners, received during their approval seeking process, nor reflects the MSP loans to Everton Stadium Development Company Limited.

Part II is now available here 

Attached: Everton Football Club Company Limited Annual-Report-And-Accounts-2023

Categories: Uncategorized

Tagged as: , , ,

16 replies »

  1. This is atrocious reading, but it’s not hard to understand , how to run a football club into the ground,hire and fire “ managers “ like there is no tomorrow pay them off very handsomely, buy mediocre players pay them vast wages, be a rest home for all players other clubs don’t want, ……. It is endless no wonder Carlo Anncelotti said we were “dysfunctional “ that is an understatement, and then expect fans to buy expensive merchandise in a club that shows zero ambition ( not the Everton I grew up with) The fans want to be proud of the club with its heritage and still can be but this is a mammoth task to put this once elite club back on track, no more “ jobs for the boys “ Everton we HAVE to reinvent Everton

  2. A lot of this mess can be attributed to Bill Kenwright and his need for ‘friends’ at the club and his own self importance. Although his passing was very sad indeed, this doesn’t deflect from that inexperienced fool, Farhad Moshiri, allowed his inexperience to be shouldered by Bill. Fans were completely ignored, and the likes of Benitez, allowed to run riot. Let’s be honest here, if you didn’t recognise systematic dismantling by that man(?), you’re either blind, or ignorant.

    • Bill sweated blood for the club,going beyond the pale on many occasions,to denigrate the man now he’s passed is the lowest of the low

    • I’m sure Kenwright wasn’t a genius but to read that report and then pick him out is the main culprit is incredible!

  3. How can Everton retrospectively capitalise £6.25m of interest charges relating to 21/22 on the basis that they are stadium related when our acting CEO is on public record (BBC podcast interview conducted at the start of this season with Giulia Bould) clearly stating that Moshiri had covered all stadium costs up to that point ( via equity/interest FREE loans)?

    I take it that this explains the change in capitalised stadium cost for FY22 from the £148.1m quoted originally to the £154.4m stated now?

    Taken at face value total stadium spend to 30 June 2023 would therefore be:

    £39.3m pre planning costs since retrospectively capitalised.

    £20.3m capitalised FY21.

    £154.4m capitalised FY22.

    £210.9m capitalised FY23.

    Total= £424.9m … according to Colin Chong all provided by Moshiri.

    Since then there has been the £100m loan from MSP and the loans from 777 currently reported to total between £180m and £200m.

    If an assumption is made that at least £150m of that was funding the stadium then £250m can be added to the total spend bringing it to approximately £675m.

    I note that in paragraph 135 (111) of the PSR Appeal Board report it says:

    “ There was uncontested evidence that the new stadium posed an inevitable strain on the finances of the Club which has to date
    committed over £800m to the project “.

    It is interesting to note the further increase from the £760m first quoted by Moshiri over 12 months ago.

    How much it is now over £800m is not stated.

    Based on my calculations above it would be reasonable to assume that there’s at least another £125m of funding required.

    Given that the project has a projected 9 months to completion with the potential for further cost inflation I would think that it’s final cost will be at least £850m, leaving a current amount of about £175m to find, not far off the equivalent of a year’s total turnover!

  4. Hi Paul, I’m a regular listener to your podcasts and really appreciate the time and effort you expend in presenting the facts about the parlous state of our beloved Everton football club. It therefore saddens me greatly to hear about the abuse you receive when all you’re attempting to do is fill in the blanks. As you rightly say, if Everton’s communication strategy was fit for purpose, informed supporters like your goodself would not need to spend time on non-football related matters. As a supporter of Everton since the early 80s, I for one welcome such scrutiny and I hope you continue in this vein! As for the recent accounts, the numbers do not lie and I actually have much sympathy for all of the unsung Everton employees and supporting businesses who must be worried about what the immediate future could hold. Very sad times indeed.

  5. All I can say Paul is, please keep us advised as no one else is !
    Regards
    Spencer

  6. It is the very sad reality that EFC will almost inevitably now enter administration during April. For many, their hopes, dreams and daily lives will crushed.

    I’m sorry, but Mr Moshiri has to stand up and be accountable for his previous and current behaviour as owner of our once great club,

    Many thanks to Paul for highlighting the truth in a factual and professional manner.

  7. To borrow a phrase from Alex Ferguson, it must be squeaky bum time for anyone who has loaned money to Everton FC.

    BMD might have cost 750 million, but its actual value without Everton playing there can’t be much?

  8. Hi Paul. Trying to dig through the accounts myself to prognosticate what the future holds for EFC, whether under 777, an alternative acquirer or, increasingly possibly, post-administration. I suspect the equity value of Everton is less than zero, and am consequently interested in understanding who the creditors of Everton are, since they may well end up controlling its destiny.

    The 22/23 accounts total £341M of loans, of which £241M are identified, leaving £100M un-accounted for. Subsequent events have only added to the indebtedness, and thereby diminished any equity value.

    You ascribe the £241M loans to Rights and Media Funding and Metro Bank. However, the “Balance Sheet and Funding” note page 9 names MSP as a creditor for the relevant period, and the charge in favour of Blythe Capital over ESDL and Blue Heaven was lodged on May 23 2023. As such, it is possible that MSP is included in the identified loans of £241M as of 30th June 2023, or perhaps they are additional and included in the balancing £100M. Since there is no public record of the relevant finance agreements, just the charges which prudently omit to include any numbers, it is hard to say who put how much in when.

    Moshiri himself had provided a further £22.5M (note 22). Do you know who provided the remaining £77.5M shown on 30th June 2023?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.