The Esk


Independent analysis of football's money, owners and rules

Velocity Capital (UK) Holdings: The parent Burnley depends on, and nobody can see

CWTE

13 minutes

The company that controls Burnley Football Club has never filed a set of accounts. It owes the club £81m, it has pledged security to a Delaware credit fund, and Burnley’s own auditor has tied the club’s going-concern case to money coming back from it.

Velocity Capital (UK) Holdings Ltd (company number 14755517) holds 82.7% of Burnley FC Holdings Limited. It is the legal owner of control of the club. It is also the weakest-disclosed link in the entire ownership chain.

Key findings

  • No accounts, ever. Velocity was incorporated on 24 March 2023. Its first accounts, for the period to 31 March 2024, were due by 24 December 2024. Companies House still shows them as overdue. Nothing has been filed since.
  • A history of strike-off action. A First Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off was filed on 18 February 2025 and discontinued on 12 March 2025. A fresh notice was reported by City AM and the Burnley Express on 28 October 2026.
  • £80.99m owed to the club. Burnley FC Holdings’ audited accounts to 31 July 2025 show £80.986m owed by Velocity. The balance is interest-free, unsecured and repayable on demand.
  • Going concern rests on the parent. BDO’s audit report contains a material uncertainty paragraph that cites receipts from the parent company as a critical assumption.
  • Security granted to a US fund. On 14 October 2025 Velocity granted charges to CCM Entertainment II Holdings, LLC, a Delaware fund vehicle administered by Corrum Capital Management. One charge, held “as Security Agent”, remains outstanding.
  • Opaque above the UK line. Everything above Velocity sits outside UK registers. The jurisdiction of its immediate parent, Velocity Sports Limited, cannot be established from public sources.

The conclusion is simple. Burnley’s solvency case depends on cash flowing from a parent whose own balance sheet does not exist on the public record. That is a gap regulators should close by compulsion, not by waiting for voluntary disclosure.

Velocity is a London-registered holding company whose only established function is to hold the controlling stake in Burnley FC Holdings.

Attribute Detail Status
Registered name Velocity Capital (UK) Holdings Ltd Verified
Company number 14755517 Verified
Incorporated 24 March 2023 Verified
Registered office One Mayfair Place, Level 1, Devonshire House, Mayfair, London W1J 8AJ Verified
SIC code 64209, activities of other holding companies Verified
Accounting reference date 31 March, out of step with Burnley’s 31 July year end Verified
Accounts Overdue; none filed since incorporation Verified
Directors Alan Gary Pace, Stuart Andrew Hunt, Michael Lee Smith (all appointed 24 March 2023) Verified
Person with significant control Alan Gary Pace Reported (aggregator)
Charges 2 registered: 1 outstanding, 1 satisfied Verified
Previous names None Verified

Two of the three directors are resident in the United States. There is no independent or UK non-executive director.

A correction to the record: Velocity is not “formerly Calder Vale”

Some commentary, including our own analysis of Burnley’s 2024/25 accounts published in May 2026, described Velocity as formerly known as Calder Vale Holdings Ltd. The register does not support that, and we correct it here.

Calder Vale Holdings Limited is a separate company (number 12919689). It was the vehicle through which ALK completed the takeover on 30 December 2020, and it was Burnley FC Holdings’ person with significant control until 6 October 2023. It entered members’ voluntary liquidation on 23 April 2024, with BDO’s Malcolm Cohen and Matthew Chadwick as joint liquidators, and was dissolved on 7 April 2026.

Velocity replaced Calder Vale as the controlling shareholder on 6 October 2023. Ten days later Velocity filed a statement of capital following a share allotment. The pattern fits a share-for-share reorganisation followed by a solvent wind-up of the old vehicle.

That matters for the £81m balance discussed below. The club’s accounts say the balance arose at the time of the 2020 acquisition, when Calder Vale was the acquirer. For it now to be owed by Velocity, it must have been transferred in the reorganisation. No public document sets out the terms of that transfer.

Ownership: above and below Velocity

The chain is clear at UK level and opaque above it. The best primary source is Burnley’s own statutory significant-interest disclosure, which states that Velocity holds 82.7% of Burnley FC Holdings and is wholly owned by Velocity Sports Limited. Above that sit Velocity Sports Partners LLC and ALK Capital LLC, which the club says is wholly owned by Alan Pace, Mike Smith and Stuart Hunt.

Control flows down the left-hand column; Velocity’s only identified investment is the 82.7% stake in Burnley FC Holdings, while the right-hand column shows the reported co-investors and the two secured lenders.

Above Velocity

Entity Jurisdiction Interest Status
ALK Capital LLC USA (reported Delaware) Ultimate parent; sole holder above 25% in Velocity Sports Partners LLC Club disclosure verified; jurisdiction reported
Velocity Sports Partners LLC USA Holder above 25% in Velocity Sports Limited Club disclosure verified
Velocity Sports Limited Not established 100% of Velocity Club disclosure verified; jurisdiction a gap
Rastar Group (China) China Reported 16.45% of the investment vehicle, from the Espanyol consideration Reported
Cynosure Checketts Sports Capital Fund I USA Reported US$200m investment in ALK’s football operations, November 2025 Reported
JJ and Kealia Watt, Dude Perfect and others Various Minority stakes; level of the structure not established Reported

Three points need flagging.

  • Velocity Sports Limited cannot be located. The UK company of that name (number 08770073) is an unrelated construction business in Kent. No UK-registered Velocity Sports Limited connected to Pace has been identified, so it is probably a non-UK entity.
  • Burnley’s accounts name Alan Pace as ultimate controlling party and state that ALK Capital LLC does not prepare consolidated accounts. The split of ALK between Pace, Smith and Hunt is not public.
  • The 82.7% figure does not reconcile with earlier reporting. The press gave 84% at takeover and just over 90% by 2024. Burnley FC Holdings’ confirmation statement of 30 September 2025 should resolve this.

Below Velocity

Entity Company number Held by Function Status
Burnley FC Holdings Limited 08335231 Velocity, 82.7% Group holding company; files group accounts Verified
The Burnley Football & Athletic Company Limited 00054222 Burnley FC Holdings, 100% The operating club; leasehold of Turf Moor Verified
Longside Properties Limited 05202619 Burnley FC Holdings Freehold of Turf Moor, the Leisure Centre and Home Farm (Barnfield) Subsidiary status verified; percentage a gap
Burnley FC Women Limited 13192796 Burnley FC Holdings Reported dormant Reported

RCD Espanyol de Barcelona is not held through Velocity. It sits in a sister branch under Velocity Sports Limited and Velocity Sports Partners. No evidence has been found that Velocity holds anything other than its Burnley FC Holdings stake.

The £81m question

Burnley’s balance sheet carries an £81m asset whose recoverability depends entirely on a company that publishes no financial information. The figures below come from Burnley FC Holdings’ audited group accounts for the year to 31 July 2025, filed on 29 April 2026.

£m Year to 31 Jul 2025 (Championship) Year to 31 Jul 2024 (Premier League)
Turnover 71.7 133.6
Staff costs 82.3 93.4
Wages to turnover 114.7% 69.9%
Profit on player disposals 59.0 15.1
Loss before tax (29.2) (28.4)
Net current liabilities (83.7) (37.1)
Total interest-bearing debt 142.4 112.4
Net assets 25.6 54.1
Owed by Velocity 81.0 97.6

The accounts describe the Velocity balance as interest-free, unsecured and repayable on demand. Of the total, £65.0m sits in the holding company and £16.0m in the operating club. It is to be settled “by various means”, principally by netting future dividends against it. The directors do not expect it to be repaid in cash within 12 months.

BDO LLP’s audit report includes a material uncertainty related to going concern. It refers explicitly to receipts from the parent company being allocated against the intercompany balance.

The arithmetic is stark. Net assets of £25.6m sit beneath an £81m receivable. If that receivable were impaired in full, the group’s reported equity would be negative by approximately £55m.

Flow Year to 31 Jul 2025 Status
Repayments received from group companies £20.9m (2024: £26.5m) Audited, secondary
New loans made to group companies £4.3m Audited, secondary
Management fee charged by an affiliated entity £4.0m (2024: £1.5m) Audited, secondary
Non-bank borrowings drawn £30.0m Audited, secondary

The club paid £4.0m in management fees to an affiliate in a relegation year. In the same period it received £20.9m in intercompany repayments and lent out a further £4.3m. Without Velocity’s accounts it is impossible to tell whether those repayments represent new external money or circular flows funded, directly or indirectly, by the club itself. That is the single most important question a regulator should answer.

The CCM charge: Velocity’s secured lender

Velocity is not just a debtor to the club. It is also a secured borrower from a US private-credit fund.

Charge Created Chargee Status
1475 5517 0001 14 Oct 2025 CCM Entertainment II Holdings, LLC Satisfied 24 Oct 2025
1475 5517 0002 14 Oct 2025 CCM Entertainment II Holdings, LLC, as Security Agent Outstanding

Both charges are described on the register as containing a fixed charge; the full security documents were not reviewed.

CCM Entertainment II Holdings, LLC is registered in Delaware, care of Cogency Global. Its LEI record (254900Z7QAVDHAVUN892) categorises it as a fund, gives its headquarters as care of Corrum Capital Management LLC in Charlotte, North Carolina, and shows it was created on 6 August 2025. Corrum describes itself as a specialist lender to sports, music and entertainment, and has been acquired by the Callodine.

The charges were created six days after the Espanyol acquisition completed on 8 October 2025. A first charge satisfied after ten days and replaced by a security-agent charge suggests a facility restructured into a multi-lender or agented arrangement. No public source links the facility to Espanyol, and its principal, rate and maturity are unknown.

Why it matters. A holding company’s principal asset is normally its shares in its subsidiary. If charge 0002 covers the Burnley FC Holdings shares, enforcement would transfer control of Burnley to a US credit fund or its nominee. That would trigger change-of-control and owners’ and directors’ test processes under league rules and the Independent Football Regulator regime.

Group debt and security

Two layers of secured creditors now sit ahead of Burnley’s unsecured football creditors: Fasanara over the club and its grounds, and CCM over the parent.

Company Charge Created Chargee or assets charged Status
Velocity (14755517) 0002 14 Oct 2025 CCM Entertainment II Holdings, LLC (Security Agent) Outstanding
Burnley FC Holdings (08335231) 0004 15 Jan 2025 Fasanara Capital Ltd Outstanding
Burnley Football & Athletic Co (00054222) 0033 15 Jan 2025 Leasehold Turf Moor, Leisure Centre, Home Farm; fixed and floating charge; negative pledge Outstanding
Longside Properties (05202619) 0009 15 Jan 2025 Freehold Turf Moor, Leisure Centre, Home Farm Outstanding

All of the above are verified against the Companies House charge registers.

The debt has been refinanced three times since the takeover:

  1. December 2020: MSD-financed leveraged buyout. The press reported a loan of around £60m to £65m with a relegation acceleration clause.
  2. January 2024: MGG facility, replacing MSD; MSD’s holding-company charge was satisfied in February 2023.
  3. January 2025: Fasanara facility, replacing MGG; MGG’s charges were satisfied in February 2025.

At 31 July 2025 gross interest-bearing debt stood at £142.4m: £105.3m of bank loans at fixed rates of 7.25% to 12%, plus £37.0m of factored debt at 8.5% to 12.75%. A £40m loan classified as current at the year end was amended afterwards to fall due beyond one year.

Strike-off: the register versus the reports

On 28 October 2026 City AM reported that Velocity’s accounts were almost two years overdue and that the company could be dissolved, with its assets passing to the Crown, unless the issue was resolved within the statutory two-month window. The Burnley Express reported that Velocity had never filed accounts since incorporation.

On the same day, the Companies House overview still showed Velocity as active, with no proposal-to-strike-off flag. The timing of the new notice should therefore be treated as unresolved until it appears in the Gazette.

Date Event Status
24 Dec 2024 First accounts deadline missed Verified
18 Feb 2025 First Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off Verified
12 Mar 2025 Strike-off action discontinued Verified
14 Oct 2025 CCM charges created Verified
28 Oct 2026 Fresh strike-off notice reported Reported

If the company were struck off, its property, including the 82.7% stake in Burnley FC Holdings, would vest in the Crown as bona vacantia under section 1012 of the Companies Act 2006 until the company was restored. A secured creditor would almost certainly object to dissolution, so completion is unlikely. But the episode is itself evidence of a governance failure: failure to file accounts is a criminal offence for directors under the Companies Act.

What regulators should ask for

On the public record, no regulator can currently confirm Velocity’s solvency, the scope of the CCM security, the full list of economic interests above Velocity Sports Limited, or whether the parent’s repayments represent new capital. These are not technical defects. They go to the exact question Burnley’s auditor has already flagged.

Risk Rating Basis
Transparency and statutory compliance High No accounts filed in roughly 22 months past the first deadline; two strike-off episodes
Encumbered control High Outstanding security-agent charge to a US fund; scope unknown
Going-concern dependency on the parent High Material uncertainty cites receipts from the parent
Upstream opacity High Parent jurisdiction unknown; ALK unconsolidated; reported investors absent from UK registers
Leverage and debt sustainability High £142.4m gross debt at 7.25% to 12.75%; net assets £25.6m; second relegation
Related-party extraction Medium £4.0m affiliate fee in a relegation year; circularity of flows undetermined
Dissolution Medium Low probability, severe impact: the controlling stake would pass to the Crown
Multi-club Medium Espanyol under common control

Ratings are my assessment.

  1. Compel filing. Require Velocity’s overdue accounts to 31 March 2024 and 31 March 2025, plus a current management balance sheet.
  2. Disclose the CCM facility. Obtain the security documents for charge 0002, the facility agreement, principal, rate, maturity, covenants and enforcement triggers. Confirm whether the Burnley FC Holdings shares are charged.
  3. Map the full chain. Require the jurisdiction, registration number and share register of Velocity Sports Limited and Velocity Sports Partners LLC, the member interests in ALK Capital LLC, and the instruments held by Rastar and Cynosure Checketts.
  4. Make parent support binding. Replace the directors’ opinion with a legally binding, collateralised support undertaking, or require the £81m balance to be settled or formally subordinated.
  5. Test for circularity. Trace the sources of the £20.9m intercompany repayments and the recipient of the £4.0m management fee.

Data limitations and sources

  • Velocity has filed no financial statements. Every Velocity balance in this piece is inferred from its subsidiary’s accounts.
  • Burnley FC Holdings’ 2024/25 figures are taken from detailed secondary extractions of the filed audited accounts, not from direct inspection of the PDF.
  • Velocity’s PSC identity, share allotment and filing chronology come partly from aggregator mirrors of Companies House. The full charge descriptions and the amount of the October 2023 allotment were not established.
  • The October 2026 strike-off notice is reported by City AM and the Burnley Express but was not yet visible on the Companies House overview on 28 October 2026.
  • Entities above Velocity are outside UK registers. Their percentages, beyond the club’s above-25% statements, cannot be verified.
  • Press figures, including the £170m takeover value, the €130m Espanyol deal, Rastar’s 16.45% and the US$200m Cynosure Checketts investment, are reported

Sources

In this article

Paul Quinn

Independent analyst of the finance, ownership, governance and regulation of professional football. Publishes The Esk through CWTE. About · Methodology · Corrections

One response to “Velocity Capital (UK) Holdings: The parent Burnley depends on, and nobody can see”

  1. Chester Perry

    Paul – I will write more detailed comments later, but for now be aware that since they have arrived on the scene the various entities they have controlled have had a significant number of ‘First Gazette Notices’ which have been seen off relatively quickly – Shareholders in Burnley FC Holdings have tried FoI requests and intercessions by their MP’s with the Business Secretary to find out how but to no avail even after repeated appeals

    as for Velocity Sports Limited – see below

    Velocity Sports Ltd (No. 132376) is registered in Jersey – you can download the articles – they are well worth a read

    Also in Jersey is Velocity Sports Feeder Ltd (No. 132377) again the articles are worth looking at

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Esk Briefing

One email a week: every new report with its key findings. Free, no advertising, unsubscribe at any time.