Everton finances

Time for boldness

Whilst attention understandably has switched to the final games of the most disappointing season imaginable and particularly the leaving date of the soon to be departed Allardyce and CEO Robert Elstone, it’s probable matters are coming to a head in the boardroom regarding the final budgets, design and capacity of Bramley -Moore.

moshiri ryazantsev

It’s a well-worn path, particularly on this blog, but the case for a 60,000 seat stadium needs repeating. This case hasn’t gone away on the back of a poor season. If anything, the case for being bold and benefiting in future years from that boldness is accentuated by what’s been witnessed at Goodison Park this season. What’s happened at Goodison this year is the result of a series of poor decisions, some over many years, others more in the short term. It is not however, just a case of bad luck. We need to reverse the process of poor decisions and execution.

I’ve heard a lot about risk, the risk that a 60,000 seat stadium can’t be filled, it will be too expensive, we can’t raise the finance. Well correct me if I’m wrong but professional sport is a “risk” business. Ask Ellis Short at Sunderland, ask Randy Learner, ask Hicks and Gillett. In their own ways they dared to dream, put their and others’ capital at risk, to say nothing of the clubs themselves. Each of course, failed losing significant sums of money and putting the clubs in perilous positions.

They failed because they formed poor plans and did not invest in their management teams to bring in sufficiently good people to see those plans improved and executed well.

What’s that got to do with the current position at Everton?

Well, it’s my assertion that what is considered to be the “low-risk” option by many, one of a less aggressive increase in capacity perhaps to 50-52,000 is actually much riskier than going for the maximum the Bramley-Moore site can hold, thought to be around 60,000.

How can this be the case? Simply the marginal increase in revenues after financing costs generated by the smaller increase in capacity when weighed against the debt the club carries, plus the level of impact of that marginal increase on our competitive position makes our ability to compete with the “big 6” and perhaps some of the remaining 14 Premier League clubs lessen not increase. Thereby decreasing the long term viability of the project, and ultimately the club.

The way of de-risking the move to Bramley-Moore is not by reducing costs and the debt burden, not of making it comfortable to fill the ground to capacity, it’s in making the team successful and competitive on the pitch. We de-risk Bramley-Moore through our Premier League position, our competitiveness in domestic cup competitions and through regular participation in European competition. Not only would that ensure higher attendances, but would generate significantly higher revenues across all income streams.

We can only become competitive on the pitch by maximising every income stream available to the club, one of which is matchday income after financing costs. I’ve demonstrated time and time again that based on reasonable cost and revenue assumptions a 60,000 seat stadium generates significantly more net revenue than a 52,000 seat stadium (for example).

Vanity has its uses

I’ve heard people question whether 60,000 is just a “vanity” exercise, arguing that if it is then it’s not worthwhile. I’ve usually said it’s not, it’s based on sound economics. However, in one very important aspect it is a vanity exercise. It’s a vanity exercise to our commercial partners present and future. It’s a statement about our ambitions, our intent and where we wish to aim the club. That translates into future value for our commercial partners, improving our current negotiating position and in future generating higher commercial revenues on the back of our boldness and ambition.

Whilst the Bramley-Moore stadium says a lot about our future ambitions it can’t be viewed in isolation in terms of the future progress the club makes. It has to be viewed in the context of a portfolio of decisions the club must make in the very near future.

Because there are so many decisions to be made – stadium, stadium financing, CEO, manager, Director of Football, possible change of Chairman, changes in commercial relationships with kit manufacturers and distributors in the next 12 months, choice of naming rights partners, the temptation (almost natural response) is to err on the side of caution. Yet to do so will condemn Everton to many more years of absolute and relative under-performance. Simply, the gap between us and those above us will continue to grow at ever increasing rates.

If that happens we have no chance of a sustainable competitive position in the Premier league. We will at best be “the best of the rest”. Apart from being unattractive from a fan’s point of view, I believe increasingly it will become unattractive to sponsors.

The value of hope

We often say as Evertonians “it’s the hope that kills you”. Well for commercial partners that’s true also. There’s currently a small premium we receive versus the “rest” based on the hope value that we become one of the newly formed “big 7”. The less likely that appears to be the case the smaller that “hope” premium and our commercial value will be in future years. Whilst the big 6 increase their commercial values the remaining clubs will probably see a flattening out and possibly a reduction based on lack of “hope” value and the marginal increase in risk of relegation.

So, returning to Bramley-Moore. A 60,000 seat stadium increases the marginal revenues over financing costs – that helps support the improvement in playing squad. It also sends out a “vanity” message and much more to other commercial partners, it demonstrates ambition and by arguably improving the prospects of improved performance on the pitch increases the commercial attractiveness of the club. That in turn generates more revenue. More revenue improves the team, assures the stadium is filled to capacity and becomes a virtuous circle.

However, for that to happen the correct decisions have to be made now, not sometime in the future. Those decisions have to be linked with improvements in the management of the business at board level, C level and below. With those improvements better deals can be struck with better partners and progress ensues.

Thus, we really are at critical juncture. I’m sure we will make changes in the footballing management in the widest sense and bring about better strategy and decision making – that seems the easy bit in all honesty.  Equally critical is the off-field management and decision making. One of the most pressing decisions from which a great deal of other decisions will hang is getting the stadium and its size right. Being bold de-risks, being timid increases risk and reduces the prospects for success.

Mr Moshiri, time to be bold in every sense.


Categories: Everton finances

Tagged as: , , ,

3 replies »

  1. Could not agree more.

    As this turbulent season draw to a close, we need to remember all its faults, mishaps and poor decisions and strike boldly, bravely and confidently towards a new and more successful future.

    But to do that, we need a plan, a roadmap of where we are, where we want to get to and how we’re going to achieve that.

    Timescales and targets need to be set, the right personnel employed and detailed as to exactly what they’re responsible for and exactly to whom they are responsible.

    No more indecision, no more airy-fairyness from management and/or the board.

    BMD is our future home, and it’s high time that the club spoke about the project – its financing, the plans, designs and of course the capacity.
    I’m with the Esk on this, 60,000 simply has to be the target figure and a tad more if at all possible.

    Just as finishing in the top four so as to enjoy regular and constant participation in the Champions League is now accepted as the benchmark for success, so to is a stadium capacity and for me, it’s painfully simple… many, many of the Everton fanbase, maybe even a majority see anything less than 60,000 as a safety-first, conservative, penny-pinched, happy not to be in with the big boys capacity.

    That’s not the Everton I grew up supporting in the late 1960s, the Mersey Millionaires, with Harry Catterick in the role of the Goodison Mountie – he wanted a player, he always got his man.

    I want Everton to be top of the pile again, playing football with style and a swagger, not afraid to mix it with the best, wanting to be the best… and a pristine new, state-of-the-art, 60,000 capacity stadium on the banks of the Royal Blue Mersey is what is needed for the Senior Club in the City.

    No more dithering please Mr.Moshiri, be audacious, bold, brave and confident… if you build it, they will come.

    NSNO – Up the Toffees !!!!!

  2. Great piece Paul, and none of it is rocket science. Sadly, historically our board are not astronauts and have their feet so firmly on the ground they are bound in concrete. And it’s nothing new. The stand on Goodison Road though lauded at the time was less ambitious than United and Wednesday’s cantilever stands. And the single decker Park End showed where the ambitions were limited. It’s to be hoped Moshiri has more devil about him and pushes us to the limit. We will see.

  3. Very good read. But you say the following

    Ask Ellis Short at Sunderland, ask Randy Learner, ask Hicks and Gillett. In their own ways they dared to dream, put their and others’ capital at risk, to say nothing of the clubs themselves. Each of course, failed losing significant sums of money and putting the clubs in perilous positions.

    They failed because they formed poor plans and did not invest in their management teams to bring in sufficiently good people to see those plans improved and executed well.

    Here is our problem, Apart for plans for Bramley Moore every decision made since Moshiri came to the club has sent us go backwards. We don’t seem to have any plan never mind not having sufficiently good people to execute the plan.

    The looming choice of Manager, Director of football and Chief Executive is the most vital thing. Hopefully we have a plan and we pick the right people to carry it out. Because any more bad decisions and it really will not matter if we have a 60,000 or 50,000 stadium

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.