Time for others to commit alongside Everton to Bramley-Moore & the regeneration of North Liverpool

On the latest #EvertonBusinessMatters podcast before the release of images and the start of the second public consultation I offered the thought that we would know a huge amount more about our club in the coming days….

So, what do I now think?

Firstly, the stadium itself. Visually it has exceeded my wildest expectations. Like almost all Evertonians I am delighted with the images shown, particularly the view from the outside. Dan Meis always spoke about the stadium evolving from the dock and it is very clear that he has achieved his objective in that regard. It should become a stunning building fitting for a club such as ours.


I’ll return to issues such as internal specifications, capacity, demand, pricing, how capacity may be increased at a future date, but credit where credit is due, Meis has delivered and to be fair to the club, the club must have provided an outstanding brief.

Evolving from a structure (the dock) that forms an integral part of our history and culture, creating a modern home that provides future benefits is analogous with what the club is trying to achieve in regeneration and community development terms both in the Northern docks, 10 Streets and Liverpool Waters area but also at Goodison Park.

Great pride

Despite having personal concerns which I will come onto, the club and individuals behind the vision need congratulating on their commitment to making North Liverpool a better place. We all must have great pride in Everton’s commitment not only to our home city but to the good people of the city also, be they blue, red or not at all interested in football.

My concerns arise though when the question is asked why is this left to Everton Football Club? Why does it take the actions of a business that should solely be focused on its core activities, professional football, to make a difference?

Standing alone?

I was struck and from a business perspective concerned, by the lack of support from companies and organisations with much more skin in the regeneration and development game than Everton ever ought have.

Where was, indeed where is, the massively supporting comments, the congratulations, the political and financial commitment to stand alongside Everton’s desire to improve the lives of ordinary people, from the Government, from local and other MPs (remember we were at Parliament only a few days ago) from Liverpool City Council (Joe Anderson aside), from other local politicians Steve Rotherham, from Peel Holdings, even from Liverpool FC (in the context of football being a driver for good in the city)?

Where is the promise of resources, expertise and political capital to assist Everton in delivering huge benefits to the city?

I have searched for supporting comments from the MP for Liverpool Riverside – none, the 3 councillors for Kirkdale ward – none. Nothing from the Metro Mayor, Peel – nada. Other development agencies, not a single word!

The regeneration of the North of Liverpool should not just sit in the hands of Everton Football Club. Whilst the intent is honourable, it is not our reason for being, and yes, by taking up management time and possibly resources (more later) it surely impacts the progress the club makes on and off the field. Progress which is essential and should be our focus at all times.

I don’t believe we have the resources, management capabilities and bandwidth to simultaneously turnback years of sporting non-achievement (which must be our priority) whilst regenerating whole swathes of decades-long urban decay and neglect recognised to be some of the most deprived environments in the UK and Western Europe. Other clubs, notably Arsenal and now Spurs have used the proceeds of development to part fund their clubs’ activities, but critically they have had experienced property professionals within their boards and management teams. Unless I am mistaken Everton do not.

The Goodison Park Legacy


Let’s explore the Goodison Park Legacy project – a tremendously worthwhile vision which if achieved will become the benchmark for future ground moves. It’s noble, it’s forward thinking without doubt, but it leaves a number of questions which require answering in the context of the football club.

It is reported that the legacy project will have a capital cost in the region of £100 million.
According to the People’s Project website, the Club will set up a Trust, overseen by a Delivery Board, in order to shape the development of the Goodison Park Legacy Project. The land on which Goodison Park sits will be gifted by the Club to the Trust, to aid the realisation of the project.

What will be the relationship between the Trust and the club? How many Everton employees and Directors will sit on the Delivery board?

How will the Goodison Park legacy be funded? As a separate legal entity to Everton Football Club Company, Limited how will it raise funds to deliver the proposed developments? If the Trust borrows money who provides the guarantees? Everton? Farhad Moshiri, an obligation on any future owner? In the event it is the club it is reasonable to argue that guarantees provided by the club ought to be directed to footballing operations rather than the Goodison Legacy.

Furthermore, would any such guarantees or potential liabilities arising from the development impede the ability of the football club to raise capital in the future be it for increasing the capacity of Bramley-Moore or other capital requirements?

Assuming the development is built what then? If it is sold to whom does the Trust distribute the resulting funds?

Two questions to be asked:

Returning to the need for support, there are two fundamental questions to be asked:

Why are Everton seemingly alone in the quest for redevelopment and regeneration?

As I said earlier, there’s plenty of organisations public and private who have more skin in this game. There’s huge political capital on offer also. If we are to deliver what is promised, surely the club needs to demand unequivocal commitment not only for the club’s promise to improve people’s lives, but real support, expertise & investment from external interested parties to make it happen.

Secondly, shareholders and fans need to know that the impressive plans for Goodison after we move to Bramley-Moore, whilst providing great benefits for L4, don’t do so at a cost or potential cost to the club itself either in cash, management resources or future potential liabilities. Nor should they impede or put at risk our progress as a football club.

The proposed stadium looks magnificent, no doubt. The plans and intent to regenerate the North of Liverpool, equally magnificent, but the club and its core business of being a professional football club geared for success and silverware, must not be put at risk in the desire to do something worthy for the citizens of Liverpool.

We must demand that others come forward to assist and carry much of the burden in bringing the plans to life. This cannot be done alone in my opinion, it is time for many others to join in the opportunity and for many of those organisations their obligation.


Categories: Opinion

Tagged as: , , ,

4 replies »

  1. Hi Paul

    I too, was impressed by the design and subsequent delivery by all concerned on the BMD project last week. As you are aware, I have been somewhat critical of the club in a commercial sense, in the past, and currently with the people we have operating at the moment.

    However, the selection of Dan Meis as chief architect, was something of a masterstroke by whoever was ultimately responsible for his appointment. He absolutely ‘gets’ Everton, and all aspects of the club and it’s support, and this came across in bucketful’s at his presentation.

    The proposed stadium is a wonderful mixture of past heritage, and the very best of contemporary architecture.

    However, my immediate concern(s), is the amount of capital expenditure the club seems to be committing to in the near future, and here’s where I may ruffle a few feathers.

    Given, it’s pioneering approach as the first real organisation to actually commit in a financial sense,to the re-development of the north docks, and the obvious expenditure involved in this mammoth task. Then why, at the same time, whilst trying to make available sufficient funds to the manager to compete on the transfer front, why promise to further handicap the club with the stated intent, to ‘leave a legacy for L4’?

    I can’t help but believe it is the growing influence of DBB and her aim of wearing ‘many hats’ in her quest to ensure Everton are seen as the original ‘drivers’ of a community based club, all very laudable and worthwhile, but come on, we are about to embark on probably the most crucial period in the clubs history, and it seems the club are hellbent on devoting as much time and effort into delivering a ‘lasting legacy’ in Walton, as it does to the construction of a new stadium, it’s sheer lunacy.

    Apart from DBB, which other board members signed off this initiative, given the ‘other’ minor task we have in hand, namely securing planning permission later this year, raising the financial package for the project, and hopefully starting construction next year. It’s nuts.

    Would it not have been merely enough to to simply leave the existing Everton sponsored additions we have already established in L4, namely the hub, the schools, the housing facility for disadvantaged people, and probably other projects I simply don’t know about.

    I’m all for the club engaging with the local community, but at what point do we concentrate on our core business, being successful on the pitch and ensuring a seamless transition from Goodison to BMD?

    There, got my tin hat on now.

  2. Couldn’t agree more Paul.

    The concept designs for the stadium provided by Dan Meis look terrific and the Legacy plans for Goodison and L4 are entirely laudable and praiseworthy.

    It is, as you suggest, surely time for other parties to step forward and shoulder some of the load and reduce the load on the football club.

    Whether that’s central or local government, industry, or private individuals and philanthropists, Everton Football Club will surely find it difficult to build a stadium, support its Director of Football and manager in team building g and the quest for trophies, and deliver everything outlined in the Legacy Project.

  3. excellent piece Paul, pinned through with care and detail and, quite rightly, some pride. I can only echo your comments. And I do.

Leave a Reply to Steve HoganCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.