Back in March 2016, buoyed after a Lukaku double had disposed of Chelsea in a rousing 6th Round FA Cup game at Goodison, Farhad Moshiri, talking of his new club, Everton, uttered the following words
“For me I bought into a new family and that’s what is special for me. I give them whatever I have.”
No one, least of all Moshiri, ever expected those words to be a literal description of what was to occur over the following seven years. Yet, almost inconceivably, they appear to have come true.
Moshiri has invested £750 million into Everton since acquiring his initial 49.9% stake in February 2016. Massive under-performance on the pitch, failed commercial expansion off the pitch, failure to address the obvious shortcomings of Everton’s board, horrific player and manager recruitment, Covid, the illegal invasion of Ukraine by Putin’s Russia, the loss of USM as principal sponsor and the deterioration of macro economic conditions have all played their part.
Moshiri’s investment in Everton through shareholder loans, conversion of loans into equity & new share issue to February 2023 in £millions
The failure to control costs, the failure to grow revenues, the delay in agreeing a design and budget for the new stadium, the reduced, below budget income as a result of failure on the pitch – remember the “project” as it was referred to in the early Koeman days – competing for a Champions League place within three years? – have all added to the amount of funding required by Everton.
Worse, the lack of performance by the board, the apparent poor governance of the club, the failure of Moshiri to address the above, closed off funding from mainstream banks, investors and lenders. Although the club lost the support of the world’s largest commercial bank ICBC, through no fault of their own (ICBC withdrew from UK corporate lending following losses with the House of Fraser) we failed to replace them with a comparable lender, instead relying on the less than prime lender, the mysterious Rights and Media Funding – described internally as “a friend of the club” – yet the provider of debt at higher than standard lending costs from main stream lenders. Significantly, the club failed to convince other lenders, particularly relating to the stadium, to part with their cash, increasing the financial burden on the majority shareholder, Farhad Moshiri.
Farhad Moshiri
By most standards, an incredibly successful and wealthy man. His family fled Iran in February 1979, just before the Iranian Revolution, settling in London. Moshiri studied accounting at the University of London, then worked at Ernst & Young and Pannell Kerr Forster before joining Deloitte & Touche. A mutual friend, Masoud Alikhani, introduced Moshiri to a prominent Russian businessman, Alisher Usmanov when visiting London as part of a “high-level delegation” seeking ways of setting up a political-risk insurance company to encourage foreign investment in the Soviet Union.
They became friends, and in 1993, a UK registered company, Middlesex Holdings, an investment company in which Usmanov was a significant investor, hired Moshiri. Gaining Usmanov’s confidence, Moshiri became a director. The company was, at the time, unique in being London listed but with Russian shareholders. It acquired a significant number of Russian assets including steel mills (the precursor to Metalloinvest). Middlesex was eventually sold, but the Moshiri – Usmanov relationship continued in a company called Gallagher (one time significant shareholder in UK’s Corus Steel).
Moshiri also represented Usmanov’s interests in many other companies, including names familiar to Evertonians such as Megafon.
Their love of football resulted in Red & White Holdings, a company owned by Usmanov and Moshiri, which although eventually acquiring 30.04% of Arsenal failed to win total control, Stan Kroenke becoming the majority (and ultimately outright owner). Red & White Holdings was chaired by former Arsenal Vice Chairman, David Dein, who having had his own falling out with the Arsenal board sought to expand Usmanov’s influence and ultimately failed. Dein was a great friend of Bill Kenwright and played an important part in convincing Moshiri to pursue his own footballing ambitions in acquiring a major stake in Everton.
Away from football, Moshiri carried a 10% stake described as being part of an executive reward programme in Usmanov’s holding companies, resulting in Moshiri becoming chairman and a 10% shareholder in USM, the BVI registered holding company for most of Usmanov’s portfolio companies. It is from this shareholding that most of his net worth is derived. However it should be noted that Moshiri sold his Red & White Holdings stake for £200 million and held other investments beyond his USM stake.
Investing in Everton
Moshiri paid existing Everton shareholders, Kenwright, Woods, Earl and Abercrombie a total sum of £87.5 million to acquire 49.9% of Everton in February 2016. Subsequent purchases including the shares of Lord Grantchester, took his total expenditure on acquiring existing Everton shares to approximately £130 million.
When he bought into Everton the club had a net debt position of approximately £54 million, including the long term Bear Stearns/Prudential loan signed in 2002 – a loan of £30 million repayable over 25 years at a shade over 7%.
In his first three years Moshiri provided loans of £300 million, paying off the existing debt and providing working capital for player purchases and an enormous increase in player wages. As a result of poor recruitment, a failure to build on a single year of European qualification in year 2, Moshiri’s funding after the first three years had a new focus – covering losses. Aside from profitable player sales (Stones, Lukaku, Barkley for example) the business was significantly cash flow negative and required his continued funding. We also had third party debt provision, firstly through ICBC and Santander, then Rights and Media Funding.
In addition, USM had become a major contributor, contributing sponsorship payments which rose to £20 million a year, and of course the single option payment of £30 million for the naming rights on Everton’s future ground at Bramley-Moore dock.
Bramley-Moore
Bramley-Moore became a reality, from the original St Luke’s church presentations by US architect Dan Meis, through an extensive consultation process and finally a successful planning application, Everton acquired a 200 year lease from Peel Holdings and set about the process of converting a 19th century dock into a modern football stadium, all at an estimated cost of £500 million.
The startling issue with Bramley-Moore is that despite literally rising from the docks, the whole stadium project has never been fully funded. Initially there was great excitement over the possibility of a local council engineered loan providing competitively priced funding and an interest margin that would provide the council with additional income of circa £7m a year. Political, practical and legal difficulties put paid to this scheme, and we were left with an initial plan of raising funding from the private placement market (as Tottenham Hotspur had), a capital contribution from the naming rights partner, USM and the remaining costs to be under-written by Farhad Moshiri.
However, raising money from the capital markets has proved elusive and has done so since 2018 – a combination of a poor financial performance and one assumes, a lack of faith in the Everton board and business plan, plus other factors outside Everton’s control, namely Covid, a changing economic picture and then the invasion of Ukraine made this funding impossible. However I would stress that there should have been few reasons for backers not to fund the development in the very early years other than concerns over the management of Everton. It’s not with hindsight that we should consider it a missed opportunity to not find funding before the larger macro events added to our difficulties.
The illegal invasion of Ukraine
The invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, compounded matters hugely for Farhad Moshiri. Prior to the invasion, it is believed Moshiri reduced his stake in USM to 4% (from 8%) increasing his liquidity. The invasion made Russia related individuals, oligarchs and their companies immediately toxic, even before the imposition of sanctions by the UK, EU and US Governments. Everton rightly, before Usmanov (49% shareholder) was sanctioned, suspended their commercial relationships with USM. Furthermore, Moshiri resigned as Chairman of USM and cut links with his benefactor and friend. One of the three legs of the Bramley-Moore funding stool had disappeared for good and seriously damaged the two remaining options
At the same time, in the absence of a naming rights partner, a stadium specific funder, faced with continued losses within the football club, Moshiri had to fund Everton’s working capital requirements and the mounting bills for the stadium – all against a background of a football club failing on the pitch and facing potential relegation.
Where we are now
In the period, June 2021 and February 2023, Moshiri provided another £300 million of funding, bringing his total funding to £750 million.
In addition, Everton sold two players in Richarlison and Gordon for approximately £100 million, the January 2023 sale of Gordon and no subsequent spending is particularly telling. Additionally, third party funding has increased significantly. Rights and Media funding increased their facility to £150 million at the time of the accounts being signed off in February 2023. I have it on very good authority that the facility has been extended further and now sits at £200 million.
The total cost of the Bramley-Moore development is put at £760 million. A figure provided by Farhad Moshiri himself. Based on the last available accounts and the funds provided by Moshiri/Rights and Media Funding it’s reasonable to assume that up to £300 million is yet to be found to complete the stadium development.
In summary, we have a majority investor who has provided £750 million of funding (far in excess of his original estimates). We have £225 million of external debt (including the Covid facility from Metro Bank). We have to find perhaps £300 million to complete the stadium. In the absence of player sales we are still running at a loss (albeit that is improving over time)
It seems that Moshiri has been true to his word – he has given the club whatever he had, hence the need to sell. By selling he crystalises an enormous loss, as no new owner will pay much given its condition, but he relieves himself of the still future funding requirements of the business, a requirement which perhaps he cannot or wishes not to meet himself.
The new owners, be they 777 or others will pick up a club in desperate need of re-capitalisation, a reduction in debt and new working capital for future expenditure. Above all else, it will need to provide management and expertise to enable recovery, take us from the brink, get us moving forwards not backwards, and perhaps eventually make us competitive once more.
The Moshiri years have been an abject lesson in corporate failure by owner and board alike, not helped by external global affairs, but that doesn’t alter the fact that Moshiri has brought this upon himself, and unfortunately upon the club we all love and only wish the best for.
The campaign to remove the owner and board will succeed in the very near future, largely driven by the events described above. We must make sure that a future owner can never put us in this position again.
Categories: Everton finances
Such a shame Paul.
I don’t have sympathy for any billionaire – it is extraordinary wealth gained on the backs of working people who probably deserved to share that wealth just a little more – political speech over!!
Despite his poor choice of friends, which speaks to your article and the source of that wealth and my comment above, he perhaps deserved a break or two along the way. We certainly deserved one.
Investing £750m into any football club should spell some sort of success or at least some real sign of it. Instead, he compounded the very visible mistakes on the pitch and at managerial level with similar and just as cutting mistakes in the boardroom.
Failing to see through what had gone before, failing to take action when he could have done so and failing even now to communicate with all of us in a more transparent fashion has led to his relative financial downfall.
So, if scanning our new horizon does include 777 or MSP or A.N.Other, I can’t help thinking what could have been, take a deep breath, keep my fingers very firmly crossed and look to the future.
We have skirted with and continue to walk a narrow path between survival and relative oblivion. Some people just don’t see it, don’t want to see it or just can’t contemplate it but it was and remains a real and existential threat that must never happen again and must be factored into any new ownership.
A 5-10 year plan, steady investment, acceptance that we must recruit the right people, buy small and sell big (the Brighton model is simple to see), and we must simply start over.
Great article Paul.
Regards
Keith
Good insight and nice to see reliable financial data. The condition the club finds itself in is entirely the result of poor management and a business plan mired in the past. Three things which need more exploration – 1. the decision making process – do the board function properly and what are executive officer accountabilities for recruitment, finance, comms and marketing, operations as all are sub-sub par. 2. Who or what is Rights and Media and are we in breach of any general accounting principles, diplomatic restrictions or international finance embargoes in this arrangement, and 3. The benign or otherwise influence of ‘friends’ , ‘agents’ , ‘preferred sources’ and the scale of payments and fees out. The club is in disarray, a new owner is thankfully inevitable and while I don’t think Moshiri is ‘bad’ the choice of people he has trusted shows he is not suitable – as Arsenal recognised – for the stewardship of this club..